8/16/07

Who Gets to Harass Who?

Please picture this scenario....

A group of professionals - public employees with jobs of which they are proud - being asked to join a celebration which makes them very uncomfortable. Not just as participants, but as one of the main attractions. Oh wait, they are being not asked, but rather ORDERED by their boss to parade down the street through a gauntlet of men making lewd and obscene comments and gestures; making a mockery of the career to which they have dedicated their lives. These underpaid, overworked employees do not the option sit out this indignity as their supervisor is a major supporter of this particular event.

Who are these recipients of innuendo and crass behavior? The secretaries at City Hall? Nope. Young nurses from the municipal hospital. Way off! How about the underrepresented female police officers being paraded as pieces of meat? Closer but not quite.

These victims were, in fact, the members of the San Diego Fire Department and they were all MEN.

Last month John Ghiotto, Jason Hewitt, Chad Allison and Alex Kane were ordered by their openly lesbian Chief Tracy Jarman to march in the cities gay pride parade as representatives of the SDFD where they were subjected to “obscene gestures, uttered inappropriate remarks and displayed lewd behavior that made them uncomfortable.”

I must emphasize that Chief Jarman was extremely receptive the men’s complaints of harassment, but this was after the “damage was done.” There is no way to be an active participant in most cities’ gay pride parades and not realize that most of the language, imagery and behavior demands at least an R, if not NC-17 rating. She may not have intended for her employees to be the subject of harassment, but she is could not be shocked by the behavior of her fellow activists. There is some question as to whether this is the first time that complaints have been filed with the SDFD for required participation in this parade.

The men are bringing a law suit against the department, but I must applaud them as the suit appears to ask for exactly $0 in punitive damages and only insists that participation in events such as this be explicitly voluntary.

I hate to always resort to the “double standard” argument, but there is no way to argue that a straight, male fire chief who required female firefighters to participate in an event with similar results would be fired if not sued or jailed.

I would like the record to show that I completed an entire post about gay pride and firemen without making a single Village People comment. You can now congratulate me in your comments.

8 comments:

  1. Fabulous... I know this is off topic...but let me go on record as saying I absolutely cannot stand Fox News. If you watch it, pay attention the next few times to the stories they run. Rubbish! It's all about sex and sex stories...I'm telling you. Everytime it's on at lunch when I'm working out they have some story about some pedophile, some rape victim, or they throw in some utter nonsense story about the latest study on how athletic men have more affairs then unattractive men.

    CASE IN POINT: I just turned to Fox News and what was on when I turned the channel? Some big story on a rape victim. I'm not saying I watch cable news, but a click over to Headline news and they are talking about the ecomony. You tell me...which one is news and which one is utter trash? Even in the other stations are liberal and just wrong about their views, Fox has lost the plot on what news is and has descended into smut and sensational reporting.

    If you don't believe me, just look at the other quality wholesome family shows the Fox network produces. Exactly. I'll leave you with one of my favorites: "This just in the Fox studios...there is a house on fire in a suburb of Atlanta!" The camera shows the small confined house fire and I about fell out of my chair. Did I really need to know half way around the world that a house was on fire in Atlanta? What crap!

    And don't try to tell me that the other networks aren't any better. If any station resembles a taboid magazine it's this one. When it comes to smut and sensationalism (read: Fox is nauseating for me to watch) Fox is the clear winner, er loser. That is all my friends.

    ReplyDelete
  2. OK...so I decided to prove my point a little bit more. All I did was go to Fox News homepage...here's the headlines copied from their page:

    "Demi's been stabbed - teen love turns tragic" (with a big picture of a girl that would fit on National Enquirer that easily dominates the page)

    OOOHHH!!! Here's a great one! Look at their section called Features and Faces! It has 6 sedcutive photos of women that resemble Maxim's website! 6 pictures include Mandy Moore, Lindsay Lohan, Teri Hatcher, Mary-Kate Olsen and Heidi Klum! Here's some of the great quotes next to these pictures:

    "Part Tarts 13th Step: A Great Tan
    Lindsay Lohan takes a break from rehab to freshen up her tan and work out!!!"

    "'Desperate'-ly Sexy
    'Desperate Housewives' star Teri Hatcher sizzles in Badgley Mischka advertisements"

    "Mom Jeans Makeover
    'Project Runway' host Heidi Klum shows off her assets in new Jordache jeans campaign"

    Scroll down and you can watch FNC IMAG as long as you click on Gwneth Paltrow's picture labeled "Hot Mamas! Look like a celeb Mom!" Woo-hooo!

    Just below that, some half naked lady sho looks like she isn't wearing a shirt kissing a chocolate bar.

    WHAT UTTER TRASH AND CRAP!!! SERIOUSLY, IT'S LIKE READING A TABLOID!!! How can anybody take this seriously?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm telling you...now I went to cnn.com to prove my point. What did I find that rivaled Fox's smut?

    A link to a video called Britney's topless pool romp. Granted, this is the same topic, but all it is is a link with a small picture next to it. It's the only thing on the whole front page...nothing like the dominating content on Fox's site

    I rest my case...even if you don't agree with me.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "YOUNG MAN! Da da da da da da da da ... YOUNG MAN! Da da da da da da da da ..."

    Aaron, I'm totally with you on the disallusionment with Fox News. But, I actually try to avoid mainstream news altogether (thank you, Google News and no more cable at home).

    Matt, great non-soccer post. This entire event was just handled poorly. While we're on the topic of firemen being humiliated concerning gay rights, whatever you do, DO NOT GO SEE "I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry." It's humiliating to men, women, gays, straights, firemen, lawyers, Christians, non-Christians, mailmen, and pretty much everyone else. Wow - I for real do need to hop back on my own blog. I evidently have lots to say.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ok Aaron, I may shock you when I say...I agree!

    Fox is certainly center-right in its commentary, which I appreciate and think is a good thing. However, its success in cable news – it dominates CNN et al in the ratings – was originally due to the fact that it wasn’t a boring anchor talking about news stories with a 25 cent graphic over their left shoulder. They stole audience share by being a slicker – and yes, sexier – version of CNN. This was also aided by removing the liberal bias – though Rupert Murdock is hardly a conservative (he is a staunch supporter of Hillary Clinton). He saw that there was a market for news-made-interesting with more conservative commentary.

    That was then.

    Now Fox News (you have to know that the news division and Fox entertainment are wholly separate entities, linked only by name and Murdock’s ownership) has taken this “interesting” news and carried it to its logical conclusion. Sex, disasters and missing girls (though only blonds and pregos) are apparently the only thing that holds viewership in a 24 hour news cycle. Laura Ingraham calls cable news “tragedy TV” because they can’t help but continue to search for the next tear-jerker, outrage or shocker. In short, they have run out of things to say. They are now actually suffering from the end-result of their own successful business model.

    I don’t have cable so the “pornification” of Fox (and television as a whole) has had little impact on me. I draw a large amount of my news from consolidators (ie. Google and Drudge) or commentators, both online (Townhall, Powerline, etc) and radio. In fact, I heard about the SDFD story on the radio and then Googled it to get the details. Fox just happened to be the most recognized source that hit on my search.

    Fox’s one saving grace is exemplified in the fact that no other prominent news outlet has even touched this story. A Google news search came up with exactly 3 results and 1 of those wasn’t even about the story in question.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Touche! I agree that news stations have run out of things to say...it's just sad that Fox has decided to descend to this level. I'd rather listen to CNN praise Hilary Clinton then their smut.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Still can't disagree with you on that.
    Sometimes I wonder if Fox owner Murdock, as a relative liberal, operates FNC in such a way as to gradually destroy their credibility with their filth-news, thereby making the only right-leaning news outlet irrelevant. Then I slap myself and realize that that kind of conspiracy theory crap is what annoys me most about the left in America. ie. - George Bush is not only wrong but he is EVIL and has a diabolical plan to destroy the US and kill all minorities and poor people.

    Wow, now we are seriously off-topic. Oh well.

    ReplyDelete

Give me your genius!